The Spanish Supreme Court sets jurisprudence (art. 1.6 Spanish Civil Code): APRs from 23% to 26% between 1999 and 2009, were normal and, therefore, not usurious

Authors

  • ALICIA AGÜERO ORTIZ Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18239/RCDC_2022.43.3189

Keywords:

Usury, revolving, credit card, loan, APR, ordinary interest.

Abstract

The Spanish Supreme Court judgment 643/2022 of 4.5.2022 (Star I) rejected that a card with an APR of 24.5% was usurious since the rates applied to similar operations at the time of contracting ranged between 23 and 26%. The Spanish Supreme Court issued a press release and an explanatory order explaining that this did not entail a change in doctrine because it was limited to accepting the facts established in the instance. However, the Spanish Supreme Court judgment of 4.10.2022 (Estrella II), reiterates this criterion even though it was not mentioned in the previous instances. In addition, the Spanish Supreme Court judgment 662/2022 of 10.13.2022 does not alter this change of criteria in any way since it does not question the usurious nature of the credit card, which became res iudicata on appeal as it was not appealed by the parties.

Author Biography

  • ALICIA AGÜERO ORTIZ, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

    Profesora Ayudante Doctora de Derecho Civil

References

AGÜERO ORTIZ, A.: “Usura: estado de la cuestión. Análisis de los criterios aplicados por las Audiencias Provinciales y tabla analítica de sus últimas resoluciones”, Revista CESCO de Derecho de Consumo, n.º 39, 2021: https://revista.uclm.es/index.php/cesco/article/view/2846/2140

AGÜERO ORTIZ, A.: “Sentencia WiZink: usura en ausencia de anormalidad, desproporción o situación angustiosa”, Revista Jurídica sobre Consumidores y Usuarios, núm. especial 2020, pp. 56-72.

CARRASCO PERERA, Á.; AGÜERO ORTIZ, A.: “Sobre la usura en contratos de crédito al consumo. «Sygma mediatis»: un mal precedente, una pésima doctrina, un nefasto augurio”, Revista CESCO de Derecho de Consumo, n.º 16, 2016. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5523795 ;

AGÜERO ORTIZ, A.: “Consecuencias auguradas de la doctrina «sygma» en la jurisprudencia menor: del interés normal usurario al control de transparencia”, Revista Jurídica sobre Consumidores y Usuarios, feb. 2020, pp. 74-92.

AGÜERO ORTIZ, A.: “Más allá de Sygma y de Wizink: el TS empieza a anclarse en soluciones razonables los créditos revolving —pre y post 2010— son usurarios si superan notablemente a los tipos medios de las tarjetas”: http://centrodeestudiosdeconsumo.com/images/Mas_alla_de_Sygma_y_de_Wizink.pdf

Downloads

Published

2022-10-21

Issue

Section

ESTUDIOS, CONSULTAS, NOVEDADES NORMATIVAS Y JURISPRUDENCIA

How to Cite

The Spanish Supreme Court sets jurisprudence (art. 1.6 Spanish Civil Code): APRs from 23% to 26% between 1999 and 2009, were normal and, therefore, not usurious. (2022). Revista CESCO De Derecho De Consumo, 43, 52-64. https://doi.org/10.18239/RCDC_2022.43.3189